Web applications
Authentication, authorization, session handling, input validation and business logic within the authorized scope.
Penetration Testing
Test what can be exploited.
Repair what matters.
Authorized testing for web applications, API s and infrastructure, with clear scope, verificable findings, evidence, remediation and retest in one workflow.
Pen test / active engagement
Customer API & Web App
Findings12
Remediated8
Retest3
Scope · Findings · Evidence · Report
Testing surface
A Pen Test starts with the scope, not the tool.
We choose the surfaces and techniques according to the actual architecture, the risk pursued and the authorization received.
APIs
REST/GraphQL endpoints, object-level authorization, rate limits, secrets exposure and abuse paths relevant to the application.
External infrastructure
Exposed services, configurations, attack surface and access paths that can increase the impact of a vulnerability.
Cloud-connected systems
Cloud components and configurations that are explicitly part of scope and can be securely validated.
Engagement lifecycle
From authorization to re-test and report.
The platformins the context of the test and findings throughout the engagement.
Scope & authorization
We define assets, averages, test limits, execution windows and permitted techniques before any intrusive activity.
→Discovery & validation
We identify relevant surfaces and validate findings sufficiently to reduce false positives without introducing unnecessary risk to production.
→Findings & evidence
Each finding retains the technical context, necessary evidence, severity, impact and recommendation for remedy.
→Remediation
Your team or ZebraByte can turn the findings into technical actions with clear ownership and prioritization.
→Retest
After the remedy, we check whether the problem and the relevant cause have been closed, not just masked.
→Report & assurance
Results can be exported and stored as evidence for security reviews, customers and compliance programs.
✓Finding management
The report becomes a fix, not a forgotten PDF.
Findings can be tracked by status, severity, context and retest, and the final report can be used later in security reviews or in the Trust Center when it is approved for sharing.
FindingSeverityStatusArea
Broken access controlHighOpen
Security header gapMediumRemediated
Exposed serviceMediumRetest
Verbose error responseLowAccepted
Rules of engagement
Offensive testing has explicit limits.
Authorized scope only
We do not test systems, tenants or suppliers that are not explicitly included in the authorization.
Controlled exploitation
Impact demonstration is limited to what is necessary for validation and avoids unnecessary destruction, persistence or exfiltration.
Human-reviewed findings
Automation can speed up discovery, evidence, and reporting, but important findings must be validated in context.
Retest included in workflow
The remedy is not considered closed just because a ticket has been marked done; the result must be checked.
Do you need offensive validation, not just an automatic scan?
We define the scope, level of testing and the result you need before we start the engagement.
